Public record of house sold prices
# | Post |
---|---|
1 | Does anyone know how I can have the price of a house I bought not becoming a public record on sites such as homes.co.nz etc? I have seen some prices of recently sold houses being withheld and not recorded on these sites. I have a personal reason behind why I don't want it recorded, so please do not ask this. catdog68 - 2021-10-15 17:28:00 |
2 | The member deleted this message. andrew697 - 2021-10-15 18:10:00 |
3 | Not legally. You are legally required to lodge a Sales Notice with the local council within one month of settlement. If a solicitor acted for you, they are responsible for lodging this notice. The sales notice must include the names of the new owners and the sales price. https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2002/0006/latest/ Councils are permitted to sell this data along with the other council rating data (with the exception of owner's names) to third parties. https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1998/0069/latest/ sparkychap - 2021-10-15 18:18:00 |
4 | Where Homes display a sale as not disclosed, that's because its sold, but not settled. When the Council sale comes through, they display the sales price. As above, you can ask QV, but they generally don't suppress a sale except for really good reasons. sparkychap - 2021-10-15 18:23:00 |
5 | sparkychap wrote: sarahb5 - 2021-10-15 19:31:00 |
6 | The details of my last house do not appear on homes.co.nz any more. trade4us2 - 2021-10-15 19:35:00 |
7 | sparkychap wrote:
When a house is sold it states the date of sale and "TBC" and that usually takes 2-3 months before price is published, but there are some that state "Price Withheld" and they have the date of sale. I will check with my lawyer as we have only gone unconditional and do not settle for another 3 weeks. Thanks for your input. catdog68 - 2021-10-15 21:01:00 |
8 | sarahb5 wrote:
Thanks Sarahb5, I'll talk to my lawyer. catdog68 - 2021-10-15 21:02:00 |
9 | catdog68 wrote: That's interesting - do you have an example address of a withheld one please? PS hope you get a good result. sparkychap - 2021-10-15 21:51:00 |
10 | sarahb5 wrote: That's interesting as the Council has an obligation to make this data available and withholding could also impede the likes of IRD with tax compliance. sparkychap - 2021-10-15 21:52:00 |
11 | If you buy at Auction, you have zero chance of keeping it private now. Interest.co.nz lists the results within hours: https://www.interest.co.nz/property/residential-auction-resu ian1990 - 2021-10-15 23:41:00 |
12 | sparkychap wrote: sarahb5 - 2021-10-16 00:18:00 |
13 | sparkychap wrote:
Hopefully all the agencies with a need such as IRD, Child support people, Justice, Police, DSW have an ability to see behind any restriction put on to stop Joe Blow public seeing it. I would think that Family Court might if there are queries about assets being hidden from former spouses. Official Assignee re bankrupts etc. if for Non -molestation orders perhaps the address etc can be withheld from public records. Edited by shanreagh at 9:53 am, Sat 16 Oct shanreagh - 2021-10-16 09:52:00 |
14 | sarahb5 wrote: I disagree - with property the largest asset and debt for New Zealanders, it's a key piece of information in the property economy. Do we really want only real estate agents to know sales prices? sparkychap - 2021-10-16 09:59:00 |
15 | shanreagh wrote: Ownership can be withheld from the Title if the reason meets LINZ's guideline, domestic violence being the most common reason. You also need to suppress it from the Council rates database separately. But there's a difference between ownership details and the price a property sold for. sparkychap - 2021-10-16 10:16:00 |
16 | sparkychap wrote:
Yes that is true. Suppressing price details strikes me as slightly odd. Ho hum, as you were. shanreagh - 2021-10-16 13:57:00 |
17 | It all begs the question..why should the selling price of a property be made public. onl_148 - 2021-10-21 12:20:00 |
18 | onl_148 wrote: toyboy3 - 2021-10-21 13:36:00 |
19 | toyboy3 wrote: just pay what the agent tells you. or maybe CV.. Edited by sparkychap at 2:11 pm, Thu 21 Oct sparkychap - 2021-10-21 14:10:00 |
20 | sparkychap wrote: Sometimes a sale price isn't put in if it is part of a business set-up which is being sold or if the transaction isn't at an 'arms length'. brouser3 - 2021-10-21 14:12:00 |
21 | shanreagh wrote: Bit like suppressing wage/salary detail information. brouser3 - 2021-10-21 14:16:00 |
22 | sparkychap wrote: toyboy3 - 2021-10-21 14:44:00 |
23 | onl_148 wrote:
This info is used as an input when rates are set. shanreagh - 2021-10-21 14:58:00 |
24 | brouser3 wrote: sarahb5 - 2021-10-21 16:28:00 |
25 | brouser3 wrote: Yes quite correct. If its a non market sale (for whatever reason) Homes will have the sale shown, but the price is N/A and the code next is S13. And obviously if its a company purchase there's no transfer because the company still owns the house. sparkychap - 2021-10-21 16:39:00 |
26 | onl_148 wrote: Why? Are you embarrassed because you paid too much? sparkychap - 2021-10-21 16:40:00 |
27 | trade4us2 wrote: And here's me thinking that this BB was for 'ordinary' people and not the rich prix of society! tegretol - 2021-10-24 10:28:00 |
28 | tegretol wrote:
$29,500 was a very ordinary price in 1978. About the same as a house in Mt Roskill that I sold. trade4us2 - 2021-10-24 11:53:00 |
29 | tegretol wrote: Maybe you should study hard, work hard, go without and save hard and then you'd own your own house like trade4us2. sparkychap - 2021-10-24 13:29:00 |
30 | tegretol wrote:
Your eyes are so green no doubt they look like Kryptonite. houseofdad - 2021-10-24 13:39:00 |
31 | tegretol wrote: And you thought it was the workers voting for Labour? Property Investors never would I'm sure. pcle - 2021-10-24 14:14:00 |
32 | Our initial $100 purchase is now worth close to $300,000 joanie04 - 2021-10-24 14:34:00 |
33 | In the 1970s, people on a lowish income ($2400 pa) could get a State Advances loan at 3.5% instead of the usual 6.5% that developers had to pay. I worked out that if I rented a house, after 30 years I would have paid $600,000 in rent and have no house. But if I bought a house, after 30 years I would have paid $300,000 towards the mortgage and then own a house which is now worth $1.2 million. Except that the first house was a bit small, so I bought a larger old house which I renovated and is now worth $3 million. trade4us2 - 2021-10-24 16:00:00 |