Another soon to be former agent.
| # | Post |
|---|---|
| 1 | johnston - 2021-05-04 10:22:00 |
| 2 | Can not read, as needs an account. gpg58 - 2021-05-04 10:27:00 |
| 3 | gpg58 wrote:
You can piece together the whole story from this and other sources. johnston - 2021-05-04 10:51:00 |
| 4 | So mistaken identity is an excuse? jeffqv - 2021-05-04 12:26:00 |
| 5 | jeffqv wrote:
Like selling the wrong house. johnston - 2021-05-04 12:34:00 |
| 6 | johnston wrote:
To ya mate! jeffqv - 2021-05-04 15:59:00 |
| 7 | jeffqv wrote:
Before your time Jeff but in the 1970s a disgruntled husband (the house was only in his name - the good old days) listed his house with his mate an agent for 2/3 of it's value who within a few hours sold the house to another mate of theirs who then rented the house back to the husband. The wife had an equitable interest in the house. Edited by johnston at 5:04 pm, Tue 4 May johnston - 2021-05-04 17:02:00 |
| 8 | jeffqv wrote:
Should now plead 'Guilty' as not disputing the assault. Identity of the victim not relevant (except to him). amasser - 2021-05-05 09:42:00 |
| 9 | johnston wrote:
Similar in the UK many moons ago, the husband left and told the wife to sell the E Type and send him 50%. She sold it for a pound (say $2), the buyer went to the Police station first to make sure it wasn't a hoax. He got what he asked for! jeffqv - 2021-05-05 12:02:00 |
| 10 | jeffqv wrote:
Love it. johnston - 2021-05-05 12:45:00 |
| 11 | jeffqv wrote:
Happened in HB a few moons ago. (40+) smallwoods - 2021-05-06 09:06:00 |
| 12 | They're cute stories, but apocryphal. luteba - 2021-05-06 17:02:00 |
| 13 | Your lawyer will advise not to undersell an asset in such divorce settlements. In such cases the seller will be liable to pay half the "real" value to their spouse. carstauranga001 - 2021-05-07 19:53:00 |
| 14 | Your lawyer will advise not to undersell an asset in such divorce settlements. In such cases the seller will be liable to pay half the "real" value to their spouse. carstauranga001 - 2021-05-07 19:56:00 |
| 15 | carstauranga001 wrote:
That's essentially what happened in my case although it predated the PRA and the court ordered the transfer back to the husband. johnston - 2021-05-07 20:38:00 |
| 16 | johnston wrote: zak21 - 2021-05-08 08:46:00 |
| 17 | zak21 wrote:
No, the case I cited earlier. An actual case not an urban myth. Edited by johnston at 10:55 am, Sat 8 May johnston - 2021-05-08 10:55:00 |
| 18 | luteba wrote:
The stories from the links seem dubious. The husband dies and the wife sells a Rolls Royce for a song? I don’t think so. He would need to be alive for the story to have merit. committed - 2021-05-08 12:00:00 |
| 19 | committed wrote: You missed the point of why the wife was meant to have sold it for a song: his will requires the proceeds of the sale to go to his mistress. Edited by luteba at 1:26 pm, Sat 8 May luteba - 2021-05-08 13:25:00 |
| 20 | luteba wrote:
I did see that but it didn’t pass the sniff test. committed - 2021-05-09 09:07:00 |
