Landlord asks tenant to store placenta
| # | Post |
|---|---|
| 1 | Then accuses them with $26K theft. sparkychap - 2021-05-01 09:51:00 |
| 2 | This message was deleted. kittycatkin - 2021-05-01 18:46:00 |
| 3 | Bet Lynch was a landlady. Landlords can be any gender. sparkychap - 2021-05-01 18:52:00 |
| 4 | From the article: "The ruling, received five weeks later, awarded Elizabeth and Jayde $1300. Gore paid a week later, making a final communication with her former tenants via the banking reference. “thievingc..., gotohell, youb....”. For the couple, the payment is not the end of the story. The burglary accusation was unresolved in the public ruling, with the adjudicator stating those allegations did not relate to the tenancy and were for other jurisdictions. This means the consequences of the judicial process are far-reaching, Elizabeth said." Just what did they expect the tenancy tribunal to do? It ruled in their favour and it has no powers to deal with criminal theft charges. stevexc - 2021-05-01 18:54:00 |
| 5 | stevexc wrote: In which case the TT shouldn't have allowed the claims of theft to be presented to the TT by the landlord...? Edited by sparkychap at 6:57 pm, Sat 1 May sparkychap - 2021-05-01 18:56:00 |
| 6 | I have no idea why they never applied for a suppression order, however! sparkychap - 2021-05-01 19:09:00 |
| 7 | I saw the article on stuff.co.nz and was absolutely stunned at the land lady wanting the tenants to store her placenta in their freezer!!!! What next!!! megan109 - 2021-05-01 19:20:00 |
| 8 | The member deleted this message. cessna3 - 2021-05-01 19:28:00 |
| 9 | kittycatkin wrote: apollo11 - 2021-05-01 19:46:00 |
| 10 | kittycatkin wrote:
Does the RTA mention landlady? pico42 - 2021-05-02 08:47:00 |
| 11 | megan109 wrote:
erm where else were they expected to store it?! funkydunky - 2021-05-02 09:15:00 |
| 12 | as the placenta belonged to the landlady, it is up to her to store it, not the tenants! girlgeorgina - 2021-05-02 09:28:00 |
| 13 | girlgeorgina wrote: I agree. Not the tenants responsibiliy megan109 - 2021-05-02 09:40:00 |
| 14 | girlgeorgina wrote:
Tenants were asked. They agreed. artemis - 2021-05-02 10:43:00 |
| 15 | sparkychap wrote:
Right - one hopes that the 3 1/2 hours of the hearing didn't waste more than 1 minute on excluding such 'testimony'. amasser - 2021-05-02 10:45:00 |
| 16 | Reading the actual Tribunal order, the situation didn't sound quite as bizarre as the tenants tried to paint it in the media. https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/TT/abstract.html?id=170 It was rather odd that they'd be upset about the defamatory accusations the owner made, but then go and amplify them by repeating them to the media. pasadena1 - 2021-05-02 17:38:00 |
| 17 | This message was deleted. kittycatkin - 2021-05-02 18:49:00 |
| 18 | This message was deleted. kittycatkin - 2021-05-02 18:50:00 |
| 19 | This message was deleted. kittycatkin - 2021-05-02 18:51:00 |
| 20 | This message was deleted. kittycatkin - 2021-05-02 18:53:00 |
| 21 | kittycatkin wrote: and landlord can apply to either. sparkychap - 2021-05-02 18:59:00 |
| 22 | amasser wrote:
Throw it in the slow cooker with some onions and carrots... lovelurking - 2021-05-02 19:05:00 |
| 23 | sparkychap wrote:
Word. trogedon - 2021-05-03 10:29:00 |
| 24 | This is about that mental illness landlord or landlady. Tenancy services would refer to them all as "Landlords" as a plural or collective group. That Placenta was apparently a bag of frozen peas. Edited by mr-word at 4:53 pm, Tue 4 May mr-word - 2021-05-04 16:52:00 |
| 25 | mr-word wrote: According to whom? sparkychap - 2021-05-04 17:02:00 |
| 26 | sparkychap wrote:
I read it in the stuff article. It was according to the tenants mum Jan Fryer. "In contrast, there were gaps in Gore’s evidence, Elizabeth said. No police reports or insurance claims to back up her burglary claims. The placenta was referred to in the ruling as an “item”. “There’s a big difference between a bag of peas and someone’s placenta,” Jan said." Edited by mr-word at 5:09 pm, Tue 4 May mr-word - 2021-05-04 17:04:00 |
| 27 | Exactly they never said it was a bag of peas. sparkychap - 2021-05-04 17:08:00 |
| 28 | I read the tenancy tribunal ruling referring to the placenta as an "item" the adjudicator was very soft on the crackpot landlord/lady who referred to herself as a "property developer" on linkedin . Any reasonable landlord should rent the young women another house. The girl in the story is an interior designer, I am not sure of the profession of the girlfriend. I accept it probably was human biological tissue which is just gross. Edited by mr-word at 1:08 pm, Wed 5 May mr-word - 2021-05-05 13:07:00 |
| 29 | kittycatkin wrote:
Landlord is defined in legislation (Residential Tenancies Act); landlady is not. blands70 - 2021-05-05 15:38:00 |
| 30 | Placenta is medical waste and should have been disposed off not stuck in a freezer. Why was the landlady wanting to keep the placenta? Sounds very odd to me megan109 - 2021-05-05 23:23:00 |
| 31 | Some new mothers eat the placenta as it's full of nutrients. I believe Maori custom is to bury the placenta on ancestral land. clicketyclick1 - 2021-05-05 23:37:00 |
| 32 | Or in your tenants freezer. sparkychap - 2021-05-06 06:49:00 |
| 33 | megan109 wrote:
That’s a narrow view that ignores a significant cultural importance of the placenta. pico42 - 2021-05-06 08:19:00 |
| 34 | pico42 wrote: so important that you store it in other people's fridges where it could be mistaken for cat food... evoalg - 2021-05-06 10:49:00 |
| 35 | mr-word wrote: so, "landlords" store "placentas" in other people's fridges? All plural now-the plot thickens evoalg - 2021-05-06 10:51:00 |
| 36 | sparkychap wrote: if the freezer is on the ancestral land, it counts evoalg - 2021-05-06 10:53:00 |
| 37 | That placenta also makes a delightful cameo appearance in this piece: luteba - 2021-05-06 15:59:00 |
| 38 | kittycatkin wrote: any woman can call herself Lord if they wish. spead - 2021-05-26 21:37:00 |
| 39 | spead wrote:
On famous one has and even added an 'e'. trogedon - 2021-05-27 15:28:00 |
