Dilligaf Church
| # | Post |
|---|---|
| 1 | Gill said he had bought and removed buildings before and described the resource consent costs as “bureaucratic c..., ridiculous”. He will not pay them, he said. What a great religion! pcle - 2021-01-09 07:01:00 |
| 2 | What an idiot. sparkychap - 2021-01-09 07:48:00 |
| 3 | “ Gill admitted he did not do any due diligence or consult a lawyer before buying the property, and did not even visit it beforehand. “It’s not for the customer to do due diligence, it’s the real estate agent who mucked it up. They should pay to turn it residential.”” sparkychap - 2021-01-09 07:50:00 |
| 4 | It's probably not a good idea to believe whatever a RE agent tells you. apollo11 - 2021-01-09 08:01:00 |
| 5 | "Wow have you ever had the dream of renovating a church? This is the opportunity to make those dreams a reality now. These former Methodist churches have long standing history in the area. The original Horrellville church Built in 1861 has a floor area of approximately 86 sqm Weatherboard cladding with a timber floor on piles and a corrugated iron roof. This was converted to a hall with kitchen and toilet many years ago and remains a Heritage Building. In the 1950s a new church was built with a floor area of approximately 84 sqm of concrete construction on piles with a concrete ring foundation and concrete tile roof. Front and rear entrances with a separate storage room. Two titles are selling as one offering." sparkychap - 2021-01-09 08:24:00 |
| 6 | I don't see the bit that mentions 'residential'. apollo11 - 2021-01-09 08:42:00 |
| 7 | apollo11 wrote: Its on the right of the listing: BUT anyone who claims to have done this all before many times and relied on that when the listing has more red flags than Moscow....? sparkychap - 2021-01-09 08:45:00 |
| 8 | At face value he should succeed in his complaint against the agent. johnston - 2021-01-09 08:45:00 |
| 9 | johnston wrote: Agreed, but that doesn't remove that he's an idiot. Do you think this would be sufficient to warrant compensation? sparkychap - 2021-01-09 08:48:00 |
| 10 | sparkychap wrote: apollo11 - 2021-01-09 09:09:00 |
| 11 | apollo11 wrote:
Yes. However, if he chooses to involve his insurer, which he should given the possibility of compensation, he will still be liable for the first x amount. The greatest harm is reputational damage. johnston - 2021-01-09 09:28:00 |
| 12 | sparkychap wrote:
Possibly and I would consider arguing for the complainant for rectification which could have the financial benefit for the complainant and would be less costly to achieve. The complainant should lawyer up. johnston - 2021-01-09 09:31:00 |
| 13 | The idiot aspect doesn't detract from the focus on the conduct of the agent but could be a factor in contributory negligence. johnston - 2021-01-09 09:33:00 |
| 14 | johnston wrote: I'm highly suspicious around all of this, as it would also suggest that his lender didn't raise any red flags (and they're likely to have known it was not a residential property, and it might have even needed a registered valuation) and then his lawyer should also have raised concerns. As well as the Hall being a registered Heritage property, it's also on the Councils Earthquake Prone Buildings register, potentially needing costly structural work. Edited by sparkychap at 10:24 am, Sat 9 Jan sparkychap - 2021-01-09 10:24:00 |
| 15 | The member deleted this message. gunna-1 - 2021-01-09 10:28:00 |
| 16 | This message was deleted. gunna-1 - 2021-01-09 10:29:00 |
| 17 | gunna-1 wrote:
What? johnston - 2021-01-09 10:37:00 |
| 18 | johnston wrote: adjective noun apollo11 - 2021-01-09 10:58:00 |
| 19 | apollo11 wrote:
Thank you. johnston - 2021-01-09 11:09:00 |
| 20 | ..pass around whatever he's smoking... masturbidder - 2021-01-09 11:32:00 |
| 21 | masturbidder wrote: apollo11 - 2021-01-09 11:49:00 |
| 22 | johnston wrote:
Not a crime to be an idiot but could be to do idiotic things. Are you referring to the buyer or agent? amasser - 2021-01-09 11:57:00 |
| 23 | The member deleted this message. gunna-1 - 2021-01-09 12:01:00 |
| 24 | gunna-1 wrote: Miss Deads, who is this fine sounding woman? And why does Duterte have her laundry list? Edited by apollo11 at 12:06 pm, Sat 9 Jan apollo11 - 2021-01-09 12:03:00 |
| 25 | This message was deleted. gunna-1 - 2021-01-09 12:12:00 |
| 26 | gunna-1 wrote: apollo11 - 2021-01-09 12:17:00 |
| 27 | sparkychap wrote: There are are plenty of other religions or cults with equally strange origins. At least this prophet for profit isnt relying on voices or apparitions. webworth - 2021-01-09 12:27:00 |
| 28 | DILLIGAF. I could get into that. apollo11 - 2021-01-09 12:29:00 |
| 29 | This won't end well sweetgurl108 - 2021-01-09 13:11:00 |
| 30 | gunna-1 wrote:
It's taking all the self control I can muster to NOT correct the spelling and grammatical errors. thumbs647 - 2021-01-09 14:16:00 |
| 31 | This message was deleted. gunna-1 - 2021-01-09 16:23:00 |
| 32 | sparkychap wrote: Where does it say he had a lender? ebygum1 - 2021-01-09 17:07:00 |
| 33 | apollo11 wrote:
Eccentrics are just crazy people with money. sw20 - 2021-01-09 17:13:00 |
| 34 | ebygum1 wrote: On the Title. sparkychap - 2021-01-09 17:15:00 |
| 35 | sparkychap wrote: apollo11 - 2021-01-09 17:17:00 |
| 36 | amasser wrote:
Trump?? mrcat1 - 2021-01-09 19:05:00 |
| 37 | So a guy trying to find a cheap way to house his family is called ‘an idiot’. believe me he isn’t the problem lakeview3 - 2021-01-09 19:42:00 |
| 38 | lakeview3 wrote: But he wasn't. Did you actually read the article? sparkychap - 2021-01-09 19:47:00 |
| 39 | sparkychap wrote: see post 2 lakeview3 - 2021-01-09 19:50:00 |
| 40 | lakeview3 wrote: That post just says "Idiot". Nothing about "He planned to convert the property into a house to rent out.". sparkychap - 2021-01-09 19:52:00 |
| 41 | sparkychap wrote: orphic1 - 2021-01-09 19:52:00 |
| 42 | orphic1 wrote: lol you came in here just to post that! Funny. lakeview3 - 2021-01-09 20:06:00 |
| 43 | sparkychap wrote: apollo11 - 2021-01-09 20:14:00 |
| 44 | apollo11 wrote:
don't funkydunky - 2021-01-09 20:35:00 |
| 45 | lakeview3 wrote: their contribution seems more accurate than yours. Funny. sparkychap - 2021-01-09 21:30:00 |
| 46 | apollo11 wrote: Yeah - I'm torn on this one. Sure the agent does appear to have misrepresented the property and the buyer might have a strong case against them as Johnston notes. But to buy an ex-church, with one building Heritage listed, without doing even the simplest of due diligence screams negligence on the buyers behalf. sparkychap - 2021-01-09 21:59:00 |
| 47 | johnston wrote: andrewcg53 - 2021-01-09 22:37:00 |
| 48 | andrewcg53 wrote: Mere conduit is not a defence. sparkychap - 2021-01-09 22:41:00 |
| 49 | andrewcg53 wrote:
I would include his supervisor given your post. Any benefit of the disclaimer has been undone by the agents misrepresentation. johnston - 2021-01-09 22:48:00 |
| 50 | johnston wrote: andrewcg53 - 2021-01-09 22:53:00 |
