Collecting estate duties in Australia
# | Post |
---|---|
1 | I'm trying to find the death of Charles Plunkett Cowdroy who was born in 1867 Wagonga in Australia. I can see he bought and sold land. He death doesn't appear in the nsw bdm index but on the 26 Nov 1892, the Sydney Morning Herald has an order of the court against his estate. Does this mean he could have died in another place and the NSW government still picks up the estate duty? Since I can't find his death, could I be cheeky and just record it as 1892 somewhere? jhan - 2019-12-25 12:50:00 |
2 | https://familyhistory.bdm.nsw.gov.au www.gro.gov.uk Edited by stock at 4:46 pm, Wed 25 Dec stock - 2019-12-25 16:46:00 |
3 | Correction: The street was Busby. stock - 2019-12-25 17:22:00 |
4 | New South Wales, Australia, Government Gazettes 1891 (via Ancestry) has a Wagonga property title issued to Charles P Cowdroy. stock - 2019-12-25 17:35:00 |
5 | stock wrote: Yes and the Charles Plunkett was into land transactions although he was so young. He was born to Charles Collas Cowdroy and Mary Susan Atfield, they had nine children, Charles Plunkett was the eldest. Both his parents were still alive in 1892. You would think they would put a notice in the paper. jhan - 2019-12-25 17:45:00 |
6 | Ahha. jhan - 2019-12-25 17:59:00 |
7 | jhan wrote:
Consider this as a possibly fractured transcription of old handwriting: stock - 2019-12-25 20:41:00 |
8 | Thanks for that, now i have a choice. I wonder why though, a young man would have no relatives listed? Curiosor and curiosor. jhan - 2019-12-25 21:16:00 |
9 | Dubbo is a long way from his home area (700 km by Google's fastest route today from Wagonga ) and maybe he was visiting or had just moved there and the locals may not have known him that well. Can't find any item in the Aussie papers either. Edited by stock at 9:42 pm, Wed 25 Dec stock - 2019-12-25 21:41:00 |
10 | Yes, but London is even further from home and he would have had to spend some time there to meet a young women and become engaged. jhan - 2019-12-25 22:23:00 |
11 | I don't think the London fellow is your man. He is in the 1891 England census and wasn't born in Australia and the age isn't a good fit. stock - 2019-12-25 22:54:00 |