THE NEW COIN CLUB
| # | Post |
|---|---|
| 3051 | translateltd wrote:
Not that I can see. It is very thin... Thanks for your help Translateltd cashintheattic - 2014-01-01 18:02:00 |
| 3052 | translateltd wrote:
Yeah thats what I thought cashintheattic - 2014-01-01 18:03:00 |
| 3053 | cashintheattic wrote:
Belgian silver franc. Pity about the damage - it will only be worth scrap as a result. 0.1342 oz less a bit for the hole ... translateltd - 2014-01-01 18:04:00 |
| 3054 | cashintheattic wrote:
What's the diameter, just out of curiosity? Weight, too, if you have electronic scales handy. translateltd - 2014-01-01 18:06:00 |
| 3055 | Welcome to the Coin Club. We are an assortment of newbies, amateurs and experts with questions and answers for newbies, amateurs and experts in coin collecting, also known as numismatics. Whether you are just getting started, have been collecting for years or have simply found some old coins about the place that you’d like to sell, this is the place to ask your questions. No one has all the answers, and you may get five differing answers to the translateltd - 2014-01-01 18:07:00 |
| 3056 | Missed the 50 - sorry, guys! Belated head-of-page post put up just now. translateltd - 2014-01-01 18:07:00 |
| 3057 | translateltd wrote:
Its only 3grams and 2.5cms in diameter Edited by cashintheattic at 6:12 pm, Wed 1 Jan cashintheattic - 2014-01-01 18:12:00 |
| 3058 | This message was deleted. oldecurb - 2014-01-01 19:21:00 |
| 3059 | I was ignoring the hole lol.. I did think the other flaws on it were genuine but on closer inspection it looks like what echoriath said and its been a brooch at one stage cashintheattic - 2014-01-01 19:24:00 |
| 3060 | translateltd wrote:
Later than i thought ... Stacks & Bowers Baltimore auction June 2012 ... cheers pottynz - 2014-01-01 22:47:00 |
| 3061 | pottynz wrote:
Wow, that was good, especially if mounted as discussed above. Thanks for the ref. translateltd - 2014-01-02 07:35:00 |
| 3062 | Lester36....you should have blacklist him after the first no sale...? chefman1 - 2014-01-02 10:34:00 |
| 3063 | chefman1 wrote: lester36 - 2014-01-02 10:56:00 |
| 3064 | chrisr5 wrote:
Yeah, that's a beauty alright. echoriath - 2014-01-03 09:50:00 |
| 3065 | Question, how do you load pics onto photoserver for this coin thread? gammoner - 2014-01-03 15:43:00 |
| 3066 | gammoner wrote:
Go to My TradeMe > My Photos > Upload Photos. I only just learned this a few days ago, although I know it's been discussed before :-) translateltd - 2014-01-03 16:16:00 |
| 3067 | translateltd wrote: gammoner - 2014-01-03 16:50:00 |
| 3068 | Yes, get the actual photo up in front of you, then cut and paste the address of the image in here. ::waits with anticipation to see what sort of pretties Alan is going to post:: echoriath - 2014-01-03 17:48:00 |
| 3069 | The member deleted this message. muzz8 - 2014-01-03 18:29:00 |
| 3070 | Your going hard out on the OLD COINS #9 Peter. gammoner - 2014-01-03 23:57:00 |
| 3071 | gammoner wrote: chefman1 - 2014-01-04 00:09:00 |
| 3072 | Alan..hows the *coin* sorting out going...?? have you work out how to do the photos for here yet...???? Edited by chefman1 at 12:14 am, Sat 4 Jan chefman1 - 2014-01-04 00:11:00 |
| 3073 | chefman1 wrote: gammoner - 2014-01-04 08:28:00 |
| 3074 | Any-body seen one of these's before [split planchet] on a half/penny coin chefman1 - 2014-01-04 12:03:00 |
| 3075 | chefman1 wrote: gammoner - 2014-01-04 14:02:00 |
| 3076 | This message was deleted. oldecurb - 2014-01-04 14:33:00 |
| 3077 | This message was deleted. oldecurb - 2014-01-04 14:35:00 |
| 3078 | they are trying to rip me off...yes bruce they are....cheers peter chefman1 - 2014-01-04 14:53:00 |
| 3079 | I only ask for RD when its tracked.. In saying that I havent been charging enough for postage when tracked... It cost me a fortune to send 3 coins the other day cashintheattic - 2014-01-04 14:56:00 |
| 3080 | gammoner wrote: chefman1 - 2014-01-04 14:57:00 |
| 3081 | cashintheattic wrote: chefman1 - 2014-01-04 15:02:00 |
| 3082 | costed $7.30 but for some reason I hadnt charged for tracking... My mistake cashintheattic - 2014-01-04 15:36:00 |
| 3083 | cashintheattic wrote: chefman1 - 2014-01-04 15:45:00 |
| 3084 | Not a rare year or mint but not a bad indian head cent - http://images.trademe.co.nz/photoserver/full/298811033.jpg chrisr5 - 2014-01-05 14:59:00 |
| 3085 | What an interesting auction. Edited by chefman1 at 5:29 pm, Sun 5 Jan chefman1 - 2014-01-05 17:28:00 |
| 3086 | All Good In the Hood ? lester36 - 2014-01-07 21:51:00 |
| 3087 | I cant complain... Been a pretty good night cashintheattic - 2014-01-07 22:49:00 |
| 3088 | cashintheattic wrote: Edited by chefman1 at 11:01 pm, Tue 7 Jan chefman1 - 2014-01-07 23:00:00 |
| 3089 | lester36 wrote:
Yes, all good here. Already started back at work on Monday, still have to put finishing touches on new joinery in kitchen and we are up to our elbows repainting the outside of the house. It's mostly just a question of priorities..... echoriath - 2014-01-08 17:30:00 |
| 3090 | This message was deleted. oldecurb - 2014-01-09 23:07:00 |
| 3091 | oldecurb wrote:
As I understand it, the Sudanese coins don't quite follow the same pattern as the Egyptian/Turkish coins that we are more familiar with. The four-digit date is the "real" date rather than an accession date (the ruler in question started out in AH 1302, so 1313 is year 12 - give or take a bit for odd months here and there - which keeps them in the 19th century still; his reign ended in AH 1316, i.e. yr 16). The non-matching variants are probably down to shoddy local workmanship, at a guess. Production quality is pretty rough and quite high denominations are in base metal, so there is a bit of circumstantial evidence, I guess. Edited by translateltd at 7:38 am, Fri 10 Jan translateltd - 2014-01-10 07:37:00 |
| 3092 | This message was deleted. oldecurb - 2014-01-10 12:15:00 |
| 3093 | This message was deleted. oldecurb - 2014-01-10 12:17:00 |
| 3094 | oldecurb wrote:
How old is your version of Krause? I tried to bring the KM prices into line with the Premier ones two or three years ago, though whether they actioned them all, or transcribed the figures correctly, is anyone's guess. translateltd - 2014-01-10 13:20:00 |
| 3095 | oldecurb wrote:
The two-digit number is still a regnal year, but it runs in parallel with the actual date, even though they are bollocksed up a little in reality. In an ideal world they would run 1302/1, 1303/2, 1304/3, 1305/4 through to 1316/15, but as you've seen they are all over the place. translateltd - 2014-01-10 13:22:00 |
| 3096 | You could check the current KM database price of the M&T token at the Numismaster website, though I'm not sure what limits there are on details for free access. translateltd - 2014-01-10 13:50:00 |
| 3097 | This message was deleted. oldecurb - 2014-01-10 14:05:00 |
| 3098 | oldecurb wrote:
I've got the 6th here - what was the KM number of the token you were looking at? I was supposed to have got a free 'contributor copy' of the latest edition but it never showed up so not sure what the latest details are. translateltd - 2014-01-10 14:37:00 |
| 3099 | Bump gammoner - 2014-01-10 17:10:00 |
| 3100 | Mine :-) translateltd - 2014-01-10 17:19:00 |
