STAMP CLUB
# | Post |
---|---|
1951 | donaldo wrote: grongy - 2009-12-19 16:54:00 |
1952 | missmad rebel58 - 2009-12-19 19:17:00 |
1953 | lucas42852 wrote: * rebel58 - 2009-12-19 19:22:00 |
1954 | This message was deleted. missmad - 2009-12-19 21:34:00 |
1955 | Missmad. rebel58 - 2009-12-20 08:27:00 |
1956 | Missmad. rebel58 - 2009-12-20 08:49:00 |
1957 | This message was deleted. donaldo - 2009-12-20 11:45:00 |
1958 | This message was deleted. donaldo - 2009-12-21 21:15:00 |
1959 | This message was deleted. fredrika - 2009-12-22 18:55:00 |
1960 | MERRY CHRISTMAS Thank you to all the people I have meet or dealt with this year. It's been lots of fun and I'm always learning more. I hope that you all have a great Christmas and a prosperous New Year. I look forward to more trading next year. stak - 2009-12-24 12:01:00 |
1961 | This message was deleted. donaldo - 2009-12-25 17:10:00 |
1962 | This message was deleted. donaldo - 2009-12-27 13:10:00 |
1963 | Hi all, A question about cal's. If you produce a cal, are you allowed to add your "own" overprint?? or do you have to have NZ Post permission? I see a new one as popped up on trademe. Seller states only 80 "overprinted". "Grab one of the rarest Cal". Your thought please. teddybearlover - 2009-12-27 20:26:00 |
1964 | This message was deleted. donaldo - 2009-12-27 20:57:00 |
1965 | okkies... have just unearthed what we thought had been lost in our flood a couple of years ago - my old stamp collection - its got the kids interested - but not in the way I wanted... they all want to know how much things are worth and what they would sell for! LOL Its not a large collection, but does cover quite a period of older stamps 1900 to 1950's (dad's era), and then a large portion of 1983-1995 (when I started work and had money, and when I had kids and stopped because I had no money! LOL). Lots of FDC and M/s, and the collectors packs ... is there any worth in it? should I carry it on and hopefully get the kids properly interested? thanks hamismom - 2009-12-27 21:25:00 |
1966 | Thanks Donaldo. I thought that this was not an Official NZ Post one. Wonder if NZ post knows about it??. Cheers and good to see you back. teddybearlover - 2009-12-27 21:35:00 |
1967 | This message was deleted. donaldo - 2009-12-27 21:48:00 |
1968 | This message was deleted. donaldo - 2009-12-27 21:53:00 |
1969 | I only looked at a couple of things on the len jury website... and thought I would test the waters with a couple of double ups. I guess I was just wanting to know if its worth carrying on for the kids "inheritance" if nothing else! LOL hamismom - 2009-12-27 22:01:00 |
1970 | donaldo wrote: grongy - 2009-12-27 22:22:00 |
1971 | also wondering whether those L Jury catalogue prices are actually indicative of value hamismom - 2009-12-27 22:29:00 |
1972 | This message was deleted. donaldo - 2009-12-28 10:12:00 |
1973 | This message was deleted. donaldo - 2009-12-28 10:19:00 |
1974 | cool - thanks heaps for the advice... actually quite keen to keep on with the collection! LOL - I've got interested again looking at what's on here, and what I actually have... might just ditch the doubles and find the missing parts. hamismom - 2009-12-28 10:33:00 |
1975 | hamismom wrote: rebel58 - 2009-12-28 10:37:00 |
1976 | thanks heaps rebel58 - will see if I can get the kids interested enough, otherwise might just flip the lot on and see what happens. hamismom - 2009-12-28 11:12:00 |
1977 | hamismom wrote: To get the kids interested try a theme eg :--- Horses,Cats,Cars ,Mountains ,Countries etc. rebel58 - 2009-12-28 14:28:00 |
1978 | This message was deleted. muzz8 - 2009-12-28 21:29:00 |
1979 | muzz8 wrote: rebel58 - 2009-12-29 16:58:00 |
1980 | muzz8 wrote:
If anybody overprints a CAL (Just like any other stamp) it renders it invalid for postage. You can almost do what you like with any stamps or CALs you own but if they are not in original condition then they are basically ruined. kiwisteven - 2009-12-29 19:39:00 |
1981 | This message was deleted. donaldo - 2009-12-30 10:09:00 |
1982 | Anyone any thoughts on the Len Jury CAL set. warm3 - 2009-12-31 14:07:00 |
1983 | warm3 wrote:
Dont they already promote it themselves ? ;-) Seems a bit pricey ?? ;-) Edited by tmg at 3:26 pm, Thu 31 Dec tmg - 2009-12-31 15:26:00 |
1984 | This message was deleted. donaldo - 2009-12-31 15:29:00 |
1985 | Ok first time in here ... I have a lot of stamps, NZ ones and worldwide, my understanding is that you are supposed to only concentrate on one country ... well I like all that I have. I do like the pictorials and anything with trains on them ... trains are a must as I like trains as well as stamps.would love to get my hands on the 1998 1898 pictorial centenary set, only have the 80c one. bdreid10 - 2009-12-31 16:43:00 |
1986 | donaldo wrote:
Yes there are a couple of 'loose canons' but the greatest prices that are being asked by the Stamp Exhibitions or folk acting on their behalf. The CAL collector is basically being ripped off every which way. Lets say the cost of 1000 CALs can be up to about $800 depending if there is an 'amnesty' [Love this use of the word - NZPO are well paid for running a page through the colour printer.] So lets say 80¢ each, but considering the initial outlay, etc, etc prices of $1 up to $2 depending on whether the owner wants to actually sell [Yes it is their right to choose not our right to be able to buy]. Then we have the problem of the 'middle man' who wants to make big quick profits - this happens with all issues - remember the silver no value stamps. The CAL collector has a scope for collecting that will not break the bank, there is the fun of the 'chase'. We have had about 50 CALs this year with a total cost of less than $40 if you buy the pack. Wouldn't this be more fun to research and write up than the NZ Post year. Those who are ripping off the collector will not be happy till they have killed the CAL. Remember the phone card. warm3 - 2009-12-31 17:13:00 |
1987 | BTW warm3 - 2009-12-31 17:17:00 |
1988 | This message was deleted. donaldo - 2009-12-31 18:08:00 |
1989 | donaldo wrote:
An interesting thought with these CAL issues is that if Post make or allow them to become so prohibitively expensive, difficult to track down and collect, or sufficiently scarce & difficult to access, then they themselves risk shooting themselves in the foot by alienating collector & user interest in them altogether.. ;-) Telecom's phonecards sorry saga is exactly the right parallel to guage what happens when these large corporates loose direction & favour with collecting interests.. ;-) Edited by tmg at 6:58 pm, Thu 31 Dec tmg - 2009-12-31 18:56:00 |
1990 | donaldo wrote: warm3 - 2009-12-31 19:13:00 |
1991 | This message was deleted. fredrika - 2009-12-31 21:30:00 |
1992 | fredrika wrote: warm3 - 2010-01-01 11:12:00 |
1993 | donaldo wrote: Two paragraphs copied from Auckland Philatelic Society, Inc web site New Zealand Post has pointed out (for example, in the November 2006 issue of its Focus newsletter, that CALs are not considered as stamps by New Zealand Post and do not carry the unique New Zealand Post fern identifier, and most of them do not have the words .New Zealand. on them (exceptions have been the already mentioned Northland Stamp Exhibition labels and the 2nd Kiwipex issues). Because they are not available through the Post Shop network and are therefore not easily available for all New Zealanders they do not meet UPU regulations for a postage stamp. rebel58 - 2010-01-01 11:47:00 |
1994 | muzz8 wrote: rebel58 - 2010-01-01 12:51:00 |
1995 | This message was deleted. donaldo - 2010-01-01 13:29:00 |
1996 | Just a slight change of topic ... I have made a list of questions I have regarding stamps in my collection, shall i post them in here or a new thread? bdreid10 - 2010-01-01 14:16:00 |
1997 | This message was deleted. donaldo - 2010-01-01 15:12:00 |
1998 | 1860 pictorial 1/2d Manuka no perforations along top –value? 1967 pictorial 1c karaka horizontal pair - value? 1975-81 definitive 7c Michelle horizontal pair, and 15c e Huhu - value? 1988 bird definitive 10c dotterel horizontal pair, 20c yellow head horizontal pair, 50c kingfisher horizontal triple, 60c shag horizontal pair –values? 1990 scenic 80c Akaroa used not franked – no gum on back – value? 1991 Bird Definitive 5c Crake Vertical Pair, 45c wren vertical pair – value? 1993 World wildlife fund 45c weta horizontal pair - value? 1994 tourism 45c booklet vertical pair –value? 1994 Kiwiana Booklet 45c strip of 3 bush shirt, buzzy bee, gumboots – value? 1994 Maori Myths 45c Maui horizontal Pair – value? 2005 150 years of NZ 45c chch exhibit discoloured border – cream strip all around the edge not white, have one with white all around. 1970 FDC Royal Visit 10c Silver coat of arms, dark blue queen side-face, stamp 12 mar 1970 – cannot find this in ACS Cat. – value? 1988 Philatelic Centenary stamped 7 oct 1988 not 13 jan 1988 – value? And last but not least … this is the text from the auction … This is the King George V postcard, prestamped with a halfpenny stamp printed on it, and with an extra halfpenny stamp added to make it up to one penny during the First World War, when there was a halfpenny War Tax on all mail. Then when later the rate was reduced back down to halfpenny, the card has been surcharged "HALFPENNY", possibly by rubber stamp. The card is unused, and in tidy condition. A slight crease at top left corner which is not really obvious, and does not detract from the beauty of the card. sorry it is so long! bdreid10 - 2010-01-01 16:23:00 |
1999 | This message was deleted. donaldo - 2010-01-01 17:04:00 |
2000 | ok thanks, the FDC for the aroyal visit is a wierd one cause it was listed in the acs cat online in 2005, but not the latest one that i can see. the postcard is to me a little gem as i have never seen or heard of one untilli saw it on here and i just had to have it. I also have an envelope addressed to somewhere in aussie and it has got the inaugural (sp) airmail mark stamped on it. bdreid10 - 2010-01-01 17:14:00 |