Windows 11 - just upgraded the laptop
| # | Post |
|---|---|
| 101 | ronaldo8 wrote:
Thanks, that clears things up. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_kernel_version_history tygertung - 2021-10-19 18:34:00 |
| 102 | tygertung wrote: hmmm, I wonder... king1 - 2021-10-19 19:11:00 |
| 103 | king1 wrote: hazelmajor - 2021-10-19 19:47:00 |
| 104 | hazelmajor wrote: As I understand it, the rollback feature is only 10 days for Windows 11 back to 10. For Windows 10 back to 7 or 8 it was 30 days iirc. You might be thinking of the option to defer the feature updates from installing, in some windows pro versions these could be deferred by up to 60 days.. It looks like MS have changed the system again, you can still pause updates up to 5 weeks in settings but to defer the major updates it's a group policy or regedit - if you search this page for TargetReleaseVersion Edited by king1 at 8:11 pm, Tue 19 Oct king1 - 2021-10-19 20:06:00 |
| 105 | No, I was thinking more of the ability to use DISM once an update had been installed eg Edited by hazelmajor at 9:43 pm, Tue 19 Oct hazelmajor - 2021-10-19 21:34:00 |
| 106 | https://www.winhelponline.com/blog/increase-10-day-limit-go- hazelmajor - 2021-10-19 21:52:00 |
| 107 | In related news, AMD have announced the minor CPPC performance glitch affecting some ryzen chips in win11 has been addressed, and a patch is forthcoming, as well as MS saying it's putting out a L3 cache latency patch in three days time. Henny Penny will need to find some other falling sky to flap and fret about. Edited by ronaldo8 at 10:22 pm, Tue 19 Oct ronaldo8 - 2021-10-19 22:20:00 |
| 108 | hazelmajor wrote: oh I see - it could still be there, when I run that command to check it I get the error message they describe, being outside the 10 day limit now... king1 - 2021-10-20 08:54:00 |
| 109 | ronaldo8 wrote: I exepct the messageboard to be gone before that actually gets released and tested in the real world. bitsnpieces2020 - 2021-10-20 08:58:00 |
| 110 | Hoping for a bit more time to clutch your pearls ? ronaldo8 - 2021-10-20 12:01:00 |
| 111 | ronaldo8 wrote:
Now that isn't my video, so I don't have the machine, but as a comprimise, I do have a netbook with an intel atom N560, which is considerably slower than the CPU they tested. It is currently running W7 and on the other partition, it is running Ubuntu with a LXDE desktop environment, and running kernel 5.4( Released 24 November 2019), and it runs absolutely fine. It has a HDD too, so no help there. I could upgrade it to 5.14 probably. Kernel version 5.15 isn't yet released, so can't really use it yet. tygertung - 2021-10-20 14:46:00 |
| 112 | ronaldo8 wrote: bitsnpieces2020 - 2021-10-20 15:57:00 |
| 113 | tygertung wrote:
who cares docpc - 2021-10-20 16:45:00 |
| 114 | docpc wrote:
Exactly. Tedious isn't it. ronaldo8 - 2021-10-20 18:08:00 |
| 115 | ronaldo8 wrote:
Not sure why you keep banging on bashing anything other than Windows. Seems you do care. tygertung - 2021-10-20 18:23:00 |
| 116 | tygertung wrote:
What a stupid assumption based on who knows what. I use three different operating systems on a regular basis. I'll leave the religious zealotry to you. ronaldo8 - 2021-10-20 18:43:00 |
| 117 | tygertung wrote: that's a classic case of projection if ever I saw one - obviously a defence mechanism you've developed over the years... king1 - 2021-10-20 18:49:00 |
| 118 | Just saw this article about a way round the unsupported question. hazelmajor - 2021-10-20 20:31:00 |
| 119 | ronaldo8 wrote:
MacOS is based on BSD I have heard. tygertung - 2021-10-21 10:34:00 |
| 120 | tygertung wrote:
Q: Why am I interested in what you have heard? ronaldo8 - 2021-10-21 12:23:00 |
| 121 | ronaldo8 wrote:
+ infinity to that docpc - 2021-10-21 12:33:00 |
| 122 | king1 wrote:
Microsoft upgrades are Boeing like with their changes; wait till something fails or is misunderstood then issue new versions accordingly. Edited by frank80 at 3:40 pm, Thu 21 Oct frank80 - 2021-10-21 15:38:00 |
| 123 | bitsnpieces2020 wrote:
"AMD just put up an update on its knowledge base blog, flagging both items as "issue solved; solution available." As of October 21, 2021: Windows 11 update KB5006746 fully resolves the performance impact of Issue 1 described in this article," reads the blog post. "AMD Chipset Driver 3.10.08.506 fully resolves the performance impact of Issue 2 described in this article. AMD has verified that the performance and behaviour of compatible AMD processors are working as intended on Windows 11 subsequent to the installation of these updates. AMD and Microsoft recommend that users promptly install this update on affected systems." New chipset drivers here And now giving a decent performance increase for gamers it would appear. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfrJd3FjemU muh pearls!! Edited by ronaldo8 at 7:09 pm, Fri 22 Oct ronaldo8 - 2021-10-22 18:56:00 |
| 124 | frank80 wrote: actually that's kind of how troubleshooting anything works... In a hi tech world of planes or PCs or smart phones, no amount of testing will reveal all potential points of failure - that's why we have air crash investigations to learn from sh*t that goes wrong... Personally I think MS respond pretty quickly for important problems. king1 - 2021-10-22 20:11:00 |
| 125 | ronaldo8 wrote: did you watch the end? it crashs more. he said people should wait to upgrade. enjoy your additional frames, when its not crashing. /lol bitsnpieces2020 - 2021-10-23 08:33:00 |
| 126 | Except it doesn't. He was running the insiders channel version, which is two kernels out from the stable release version. Which is extremely stable, one of the key reasons MS pushed to the tighter hardware model was based on the reliability stats from several years of surface deployment that run that hardware model, 97% less crashes. MUH PEARLS!!! ronaldo8 - 2021-10-23 12:06:00 |
| 127 | O, and 60% less malware infections. ronaldo8 - 2021-10-23 12:26:00 |
| 128 | bitsnpieces2020 wrote:
Did you watch to the end or just pick out what you wants to complain about docpc - 2021-10-23 16:56:00 |
| 129 | Yes, but don't expect it to run on your old machine. You will be wanting a new machine for it. Old machines run better on old versions of Windows. tygertung - 2021-10-23 17:19:00 |
| 130 | ronaldo8 wrote:
Please tell me more.... Which operating systems please? tygertung - 2021-10-23 17:24:00 |
| 131 | cube_guy wrote:
I don't see it as some "crazy" design philosophy. Really, why would you expect Microsoft to design their operating system for obsolete hardware. The market share is smaller, so it wouldn't be profitable. The purpose of a company is to make money. If you insist on using obsolete hardware, you will need to find an organisation whose purpose isn't to make money as they will be able to cater to more specialised use cases. tygertung - 2021-10-23 17:37:00 |
| 132 | ronaldo8 wrote: lol yea MS are the experts at detyecting malware. bitsnpieces2020 - 2021-10-23 18:06:00 |
| 133 | Look, the computers now are considerably faster than the ones which were produced four years ago. So why would you expect Microsoft to be developing their operating system for old slow obsolete machines? It is unreasonable to do so. They are going to be developing it for machines of the present, not machines of the past. tygertung - 2021-10-23 18:10:00 |
| 134 | tygertung wrote:
You are a broken record with no information of value , you are only reading what you want to see on the internet and have no real value of input as you have not yourself installed and used Windows 11 on any machine yourself to give a true value of information . docpc - 2021-10-23 18:23:00 |
| 135 | tygertung wrote:
They give it away for free you can use win 7 , 8 or 10 key to activate , yes im sure Microsoft going to make a fortune on it , your obsolete with your reasoning docpc - 2021-10-23 18:41:00 |
| 136 | tygertung wrote: is this directed at some imaginary antagonist? your repeating yourself over and over with the same information everyone already knows, for what purpose (i wonder...). My Dad had to go into a dementia unit for this sort of behaviour... Edited by king1 at 9:05 pm, Sat 23 Oct king1 - 2021-10-23 21:04:00 |
| 137 | tygertung wrote: Do I detect one of those veiled plugs you don't make? king1 - 2021-10-23 21:24:00 |
| 138 | The member deleted this message. gyrogearloose - 2021-10-23 21:37:00 |
| 139 | docpc wrote:
I only have ancient machines which are not suitable for Windows 11 use. This machine has a second generation i5 CPU and runs real fast on Windows 7. Probably too old to be a good candidate for W11. I will stick to Windows 7 for now thanks. tygertung - 2021-10-24 08:22:00 |
| 140 | docpc wrote:
They will sell it when anyone buys a new PC. There is a new requirement for TPM 2.0 compliant hardware, so old machines will not be compatible unless one hacks into the system. MS might even consider releasing a patch to not allow this any more. Therefore you can buy a new machine with a new licence key instead. tygertung - 2021-10-24 08:24:00 |
| 141 | You really should stop talking about things you don't know anthing about like an ignorant clod who can't shut his mouth. ronaldo8 - 2021-10-24 10:58:00 |
| 142 | bitsnpieces2020 wrote:
You aren't too sharp are you bitsi. For instance you don't understand the difference between absolute and relative measurement and therefore why your red herring there is flapping about like the foolish irrelevance it is. Very entertaining though. ronaldo8 - 2021-10-24 11:20:00 |
| 143 | bitsnpieces2020 wrote: lol, that's like saying that because i'm a member of the AA, i'm responsible for any car accidents on the road... Dozens if not hundreds of companies 'championed' UEFI, it is meaningless to suggest that any one of them is more or less competent at, or responsible for, any security issues that are discovered, regardless of age... As disappointing as that may be for you, that is how some of the more obscure security threats are discovered... king1 - 2021-10-24 11:41:00 |
| 144 | ronaldo8 wrote:
Do you actually have anything useful to say, or just nasty comments? tygertung - 2021-10-24 15:21:00 |
| 145 | king1 wrote: Only one made the UEFI windows boot loader, specifically targetted by the malware, and then despite trumpetting it as a security measure, were utterly redfaced when it was compromised, for 9 years. Even then it was ESET who found it. And I'm replying in the context of ronaldo claiming windows 11 is 60% more malware resistant. bitsnpieces2020 - 2021-10-24 21:16:00 |
| 146 | ronaldo is not claiming anything , hes stating a fact written fact from Microsoft's own mouth "Microsoft claims Windows 11 reduces malware by 60 percent, here’s how it works" Will have to see if it works in real time in the future won't we docpc - 2021-10-25 09:26:00 |
