TM Forums
Back to search

Rotorua lakes council - what a mess

#Post
51
market1 wrote:

Water rates has now become close to the normal rate fee. That means council rates have almost doubled. This is what happens when public servants no longer serve the public. We expect them to do the right thing, however they have their own agenda.

who holds them accountable? Seems like one big back slapping exercise on their part. The old ‘I will pay you more if you support me’ bs

Edited by lakeview3 at 10:12 pm, Tue 22 Jun

lakeview3 - 2021-06-22 22:12:00
52
pico42 wrote:

In very simple terms (even though it seems you simply won’t be told anything you have already decided you know) rates don’t double because house prices double. Rates double because council costs double.
Relative house prices are the mechanism for apportioning those budgeted costs to individual properties.

Our rates are about $3K. Up from about $2.5k when we bought 15 years ago. The house value has about doubled in that time.

forget it pico, she’s just trolling.

sparkychap - 2021-06-22 22:30:00
53
lakeview3 wrote:

I never said my rates hve doubled…..but now I think about it, it’s not far away from that being the case.

All I know is that paying a whole bunch of ‘deputies’ more money ISNT a what I am paying for.

No, you never said that rates doubled. But what you did say is incorrect. And you know it is incorrect. It has been explained to you before. Either you still don’t understand, in which case your comments come from a position of ignorance, or you do understand it, choose not to, and are simply happy to lie your way through these posts. Which is it?

In either case, your contribution to this thread is of little value.

pico42 - 2021-06-22 23:15:00
54
pico42 wrote:

No, you never said that rates doubled. But what you did say is incorrect. And you know it is incorrect. It has been explained to you before. Either you still don’t understand, in which case your comments come from a position of ignorance, or you do understand it, choose not to, and are simply happy to lie your way through these posts. Which is it?

In either case, your contribution to this thread is of little value.

do you work for the council or something? That might explain the need to resort condescending put downs??

I started the thread and it’s my opinion of which I am entitled to view. You on the other hand don’t need to contribute anything to the thread and even less so since you don’t live here and clearly have no idea what our council isn’t capable of.

Bet you’d be just stoked if they contemplated wasting 80K on importing mud from Korea for a festival only to give the tickets away for free to school kids….we still never got to the bottom of whose relly started the company to run that festival only for it to make a loss and then the ‘company’ close down shortly afterwards….a loss of over 400K to the ratepayers.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/103552677/controversial-mud
topia-festival-not-set-to-stick

https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/99663714/ratepayers-stuck-w
ith-437000-mudtopia-bill?rm=m

I best not mention ‘the sculpture’

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/123831805/monumental-waste-
ahead-sign-appears-ahead-of-743k-rotorua-sculpture

Edited by lakeview3 at 11:33 pm, Tue 22 Jun

lakeview3 - 2021-06-22 23:23:00
55

And if we had any doubts about where these stupid ideas are hatched, look no further…..secret meetings

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/rotorua-daily-post/news/no-plans-
to-open-rotorua-council-workshops-to-public-despite-ratepaye
rs-plea/SYSWGXW5FGPL3PNN4IFM7TEEEA/?utm_medium=Social&ut
m_source=Facebook#Echobox=1624260145

So much for democracy…..this is the kind of c**p we get for our rates $$

lakeview3 - 2021-06-22 23:52:00
56

Panuku which is part of Auckland City have been trying for some years to build an apartment block on Dominion Rd.

WTF is the council doing working as a developer and why haven’t they been able to get the development through resource consent which is also Auckland Council?

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/123341625/auckland-council-
apartment-development-still-without-consent-four-years-on

princess52 - 2021-06-23 01:02:00
57
lakeview3 wrote:

do you work for the council or something? That might explain the need to resort condescending put downs??

I started the thread and it’s my opinion of which I am entitled to view. You on the other hand don’t need to contribute anything to the thread and even less so since you don’t live here and clearly have no idea what our council isn’t capable of.

Bet you’d be just stoked if they contemplated wasting 80K on importing mud from Korea for a festival only to give the tickets away for free to school kids….we still never got to the bottom of whose relly started the company to run that festival only for it to make a loss and then the ‘company’ close down shortly afterwards….a loss of over 400K to the ratepayers.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/103552677/controversial-mud
topia-festival-not-set-to-stick

https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/99663714/ratepayers-stuck-w
ith-437000-mudtopia-bill?rm=m

I best not mention ‘the sculpture’

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/123831805/monumental-waste-
ahead-sign-appears-ahead-of-743k-rotorua-sculpture

Nothing to do with rising house values.

sparkychap - 2021-06-23 07:03:00
58
lakeview3 wrote:

And if we had any doubts about where these stupid ideas are hatched, look no further…..secret meetings

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/rotorua-daily-post/news/no-plans-
to-open-rotorua-council-workshops-to-public-despite-ratepaye
rs-plea/SYSWGXW5FGPL3PNN4IFM7TEEEA/?utm_medium=Social&ut
m_source=Facebook#Echobox=1624260145

So much for democracy…..this is the kind of c**p we get for our rates $$

Nothing to do with rising house values.

sparkychap - 2021-06-23 07:03:00
59
sparkychap wrote:

Nothing to do with rising house values.

I never said it was, but it’s got a lot to do with waste of ratepayers money.

lakeview3 - 2021-06-23 07:37:00
60
sparkychap wrote:

Nothing to do with rising house values.

I never said it was but it’s got a lot to do with waste of ratepayers money. So disrespectful of them whrn many of us are out their scratching a living together to pay for our rates while they hold secret meetings and throw the money wantonly around on stupid ideas.

lakeview3 - 2021-06-23 07:39:00
61
princess52 wrote:

Panuku which is part of Auckland City have been trying for some years to build an apartment block on Dominion Rd.

WTF is the council doing working as a developer and why haven’t they been able to get the development through resource consent which is also Auckland Council?

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/123341625/auckland-council-
apartment-development-still-without-consent-four-years-on[/q
uote]

unbelievable incompetence and yes why are they pretending to be a developer?

lakeview3 - 2021-06-23 07:39:00
62
lakeview3 wrote:

I never said it was, but it’s got a lot to do with waste of ratepayers money.

Yes you did. You said:
“… In thr meantime the house values keep going up so they can keep charging us higher rates for the same s**t service …”

Are you now retracting the above statement?

pico42 - 2021-06-23 08:35:00
63
lakeview3 wrote:

I never said it was, but it’s got a lot to do with waste of ratepayers money.

So you agree that rising house prices does not equal rising rates. Good, glad we got that settled.

Until the next time.

sparkychap - 2021-06-23 08:38:00
64
pico42 wrote:

No, you never said that rates doubled. But what you did say is incorrect. And you know it is incorrect. It has been explained to you before. Either you still don’t understand, in which case your comments come from a position of ignorance, or you do understand it, choose not to, and are simply happy to lie your way through these posts. Which is it?

In either case, your contribution to this thread is of little value.

I've lived in the same house for 20 years, my rates have more than doubled in that time.

bitsnpieces2020 - 2021-06-23 08:40:00
65
pico42 wrote:

Yes you did. You said:
“… In thr meantime the house values keep going up so they can keep charging us higher rates for the same s**t service …”

Are you now retracting the above statement?

sorry why are you in the thread? Did you want to comment on the Rotorua lakes council? no?

lakeview3 - 2021-06-23 08:47:00
66
sparkychap wrote:

So you agree that rising house prices does not equal rising rates. Good, glad we got that settled.

Until the next time.

sorry if you didn’t understand my post…..

lakeview3 - 2021-06-23 08:53:00
67
lakeview3 wrote:

sorry if you didn’t understand my post…..

So why not explain what you meant by "In thr (sic) meantime the house values keep going up so they can keep charging us higher rates for the same s**t service" then?

sparkychap - 2021-06-23 08:54:00
68
bitsnpieces2020 wrote:

I'v-
e lived in the same house for 20 years, my rates have more than doubled in that time.

my one I bought in 2000 the rates were $980, just looked them up again and they are now $3500.

Incomes haven’t increased by that much in the same time period (unless the person works for RLC obviously lol)

Should we place bets on when the RLC will finally fix that nasty pothole at the corner of fairy springs road and lake road - everyone knows that one! Maybe they could have a ‘secret meeting’ about it and surprise us! ???? I mean it’s only been there a couple of years!

lakeview3 - 2021-06-23 08:57:00
69
sparkychap wrote:

So why not explain what you meant by "In thr (sic) meantime the house values keep going up so they can keep charging us higher rates for the same s**t service" then?

if you can’t work it out then meh….anyway I have work to do….you might need to find someone else to have a go at….

lakeview3 - 2021-06-23 08:58:00
70
lakeview3 wrote:

if you can’t work it out then meh….anyway I have work to do….you might need to find someone else to have a go at….

lol the usual response from you when challenged. All good, We all understand your error.

sparkychap - 2021-06-23 09:17:00
71
lakeview3 wrote:

sorry why are you in the thread? Did you want to comment on the Rotorua lakes council? no?

At the moment I am in here pulling you up on your falsehoods.
You appear to be doubling down on it.

pico42 - 2021-06-23 12:09:00
72
sparkychap wrote:

So why not explain what you meant by "In thr (sic) meantime the house values keep going up so they can keep charging us higher rates for the same s**t service" then?

sorry you can’t understand that

lakeview3 - 2021-06-23 14:04:00
73
pico42 wrote:

At the moment I am in here pulling you up on your falsehoods.
You appear to be doubling down on it.

oh yeah what ‘falsehoods’?

lakeview3 - 2021-06-23 14:04:00
74

Someone who is happy to admit when they are wrong, and learn from it, shows strength of character.

A lot of the rates rises might not be the fault of council. They have had further responsibilities foisted on them by central government than they once would have had.

apollo11 - 2021-06-23 14:34:00
75
lakeview3 wrote:

sorry you can’t understand that

lol the usual response from you when challenged. All good, We all understand your error.

sparkychap - 2021-06-23 15:00:00
76
apollo11 wrote:

Someone who is happy to admit when they are wrong, and learn from it, shows strength of character.

A lot of the rates rises might not be the fault of council. They have had further responsibilities foisted on them by central government than they once would have had.

where did they get the extra money for the payrises for the 7 deputies? Where did they get the money for the mud festival and sculpture? (Oh don’t worry us ratepayers only paid for some of the mud festival….the other taxpayers from around NZ paid the rest!) ????

lakeview3 - 2021-06-23 15:15:00
77
sparkychap wrote:

lol the usual response from you when challenged. All good, We all understand your error.

as usual you are now making false claims and personal attacks and not sticking to the topic.

lakeview3 - 2021-06-23 15:15:00
78
lakeview3 wrote:

where did they get the extra money for the payrises for the 7 deputies? Where did they get the money for the mud festival and sculpture? (Oh don’t worry us ratepayers only paid for some of the mud festival….the other taxpayers from around NZ paid the rest!) ????

Festivals and sculptures might come under this: https://childyouthwellbeing.govt.nz/actions/actions-outcome/
local-government-community-wellbeing-amendment-bill-complete
d

apollo11 - 2021-06-23 15:25:00
79
apollo11 wrote:

Festivals and sculptures might come under this: https://childyouthwellbeing.govt.nz/actions/actions-outcome/
local-government-community-wellbeing-amendment-bill-complete
d

good try

lakeview3 - 2021-06-23 15:28:00
80
lakeview3 wrote:

good try


Try at what?

apollo11 - 2021-06-23 15:54:00
81
apollo11 wrote:

Someone who is happy to admit when they are wrong, and learn from it, shows strength of character.

A lot of the rates rises might not be the fault of council. They have had further responsibilities foisted on them by central government than they once would have had.

And gladly accepted on behalf of their bosses, the ratepayers. How was that approved. Maybe councils adopt government responsibilities as it increases councils portfolio of things to do. It is enabling councils to get bigger.

market1 - 2021-06-23 15:55:00
82
lakeview3 wrote:

as usual you are now making false claims and personal attacks and not sticking to the topic.

what false claims am I making?

sparkychap - 2021-06-23 15:59:00
83
market1 wrote:

And gladly accepted on behalf of their bosses, the ratepayers. How was that approved. Maybe councils adopt government responsibilities as it increases councils portfolio of things to do. It is enabling councils to get bigger.


Socialist governments tend to metastasise. Both central and regional. At this rate we will all be working for the government.

apollo11 - 2021-06-23 16:01:00
84
lakeview3 wrote:

oh yeah what ‘falsehoods’?

This one
“… In thr meantime the house values keep going up so they can keep charging us higher rates for the same s**t service …”
It is incorrect. You refuse to admit that. Why do you do that?

pico42 - 2021-06-23 16:16:00
85
pico42 wrote:

This one
“… In thr meantime the house values keep going up so they can keep charging us higher rates for the same s**t service …”
It is incorrect. You refuse to admit that. Why do you do that?

I stand by everything I say.

lakeview3 - 2021-06-23 16:41:00
86
lakeview3 wrote:

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/ldr/444974/rotor
ua-lakes-council-s-7-deputy-ceos-mp-former-mayor-call-for-in
dependent-review

Puts rates up by 9%, then appoints 7 deputy CEOs and give them pay rises!

I wish I was joking.

Do you stand by this statement?

sparkychap - 2021-06-23 17:26:00
87
sparkychap wrote:

Do you stand by this statement?

yep I do

Now don’t you have something better to do than keep asking me the same question? ???? bit stalkery…..

lakeview3 - 2021-06-23 17:52:00
88
lakeview3 wrote:

yep I do

Now don’t you have something better to do than keep asking me the same question? ???? bit stalkery…..

So they got pay rises, these 7 newly appointed deputy CEOs?

sparkychap - 2021-06-23 17:55:00
89
sparkychap wrote:

So they got pay rises, these 7 newly appointed deputy CEOs?

read the article, they are already working in the council. Why do we need 7 deputies? What other council has more than one deputy or any?

What accountability do these people have and to whom? (dont worry I know the answer to that one lol)

Now maybe move on to hounding someone else unless ups have something valuable to add to the thread.

lakeview3 - 2021-06-23 18:07:00
90
lakeview3 wrote:

read the article, they are already working in the council. Why do we need 7 deputies? What other council has more than one deputy or any?

What accountability do these people have and to whom? (dont worry I know the answer to that one lol)

Now maybe move on to hounding someone else unless ups have something valuable to add to the thread.

So they all got pay rises?

sparkychap - 2021-06-23 18:08:00
91

This message was deleted.

kiwilandchch - 2021-06-23 18:16:00
92
lakeview3 wrote:

Oh and I haven’t even mentioned how they allowed all the homeless people to come here from out of town and turn this once lovely city into a festering hub of crime! Thanks for nothing eh? Boy are we getting ‘bang’ for our buck!

Sounds like you have a problem with central government more than local council. The homeless and the roading never mind the crims all being let out of jail are central government issues.

3tomany - 2021-06-23 19:32:00
93
lakeview3 wrote:

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/ldr/444974/rotor
ua-lakes-council-s-7-deputy-ceos-mp-former-mayor-call-for-in
dependent-review

Puts rates up by 9%, then appoints 7 deputy CEOs and give them pay rises!

I wish I was joking.

Looks like you have a good National MP on your side.

3tomany - 2021-06-23 19:39:00
94
3tomany wrote:

Sounds like you have a problem with central government more than local council. The homeless and the roading never mind the crims all being let out of jail are central government issues.

both i think

lakeview3 - 2021-06-23 19:49:00
95
3tomany wrote:

Looks like you have a good National MP on your side.

what a shame he didn’t do much while he had the power to and in fact many of these issues with the homeless are a direct result of some of the lack of action to address the housing situation way back then

Edited by lakeview3 at 7:50 pm, Wed 23 Jun

lakeview3 - 2021-06-23 19:49:00
96
lakeview3 wrote:

what a shame he didn’t do much while he had the power to and in fact many of these issues with the homeless are a direct result of some of the lack of action to address the housing situation way back then

Looking back there realy was no housing problem back then compared to what we have now.

3tomany - 2021-06-24 04:41:00
97
3tomany wrote:

Looking back there realy was no housing problem back then compared to what we have now.

that’s true, however I have been saying it for years. I saw it coming because I could see the people living in garages, portacabins and caravans long before other people. If we flood the country with 500,000 people the people on the low end get turfed out so the newcomers can fit in. Of course I got poo poohed on here because most people drive around with blinkers on or don’t lower themselves to go through suburbs in lower socio economic groups. It’s the old 10 in the bed story, there isn’t room for 10 and someone has to fall out.

The trouble is, when you continually marginalise people, eventually they get past the point of salvation because they slip into addiction. Can hardly blame them really can you? So now we are left with motels full of previously displaced people. And I tell you what, we aren’t going to rehome these people any time soon. I would suggest most are now incapable of looking after a house, or paying their own power bill.

What got us here? Greed. That’s what. Inequality is now so rampant that nothing will turn back time. Throwing money at those people will not work. Most are lost. The better thing to do is to educate children snd focus on them. Tske back some of the ill gotten gains of the older generation and put it into the future. THAT is the only way forward.

lakeview3 - 2021-06-24 06:57:00
98

I heard a guy on ZB who is a housing expert and he said the reasons we are short of houses are varied from immigration to land banking but by far the biggest cause is that there are less people living in a house on a per house basis. I must say i never considered that and when i think of my kids they all live in 4 bedroom houses with just them and their partner and one has a child. None of them have a flat mate.

3tomany - 2021-06-24 07:58:00
99
3tomany wrote:

I heard a guy on ZB who is a housing expert and he said the reasons we are short of houses are varied from immigration to land banking but by far the biggest cause is that there are less people living in a house on a per house basis. I must say i never considered that and when i think of my kids they all live in 4 bedroom houses with just them and their partner and one has a child. None of them have a flat mate.

yes that is part of the problem. It’s lack of planning regarding population demographics. For example in my half of the street there are 17 houses, and I worked out there are 1.76 people per house. This is mainly because it is full of older people living in 3-5 bedroom houses, who may live elsewhere IF there was enough smaller modern low maintenance safe places to live. Only 3 children live in those 17 houses. So yes there is a ‘lack of houses’ - the wrong houses. There are 6 empty houses in the street.

And yes there is land banking, but it’s also the councils not allowing people to subdivide their properties. If they allowed this is would be a gradual increase and would not put the same strain on infrastructure like a large subdivision would. But no, our council and probably many others are too busy patting themselves on the back and giving each other pay increases to do anything sensible.

Edited by lakeview3 at 8:45 am, Thu 24 Jun

lakeview3 - 2021-06-24 08:40:00
100
kiwilandchch wrote:

Sounds like a plan build houses on them for the homeless

Who will build these special houses?

tygertung - 2021-06-24 09:28:00
Free Web Hosting