Is it ok for an agent to lie to you
| # | Post |
|---|---|
| 51 | cinderellagowns wrote:
???? Perhaps it was the selfies...???????? lovelurking - 2021-05-23 08:57:00 |
| 52 | Ohhh, look, I’m on top...???? lovelurking - 2021-05-23 08:59:00 |
| 53 | lovelurking wrote:
How's the view? smallwoods - 2021-05-23 09:51:00 |
| 54 | smallwoods wrote:
That reminds me of a joke from my high school days ... Question: why does the Pope wear undies in the shower? ???? lovelurking - 2021-05-23 10:07:00 |
| 55 | johnston wrote: masturbidder - 2021-05-23 11:09:00 |
| 56 | lovelurking wrote:
Go ahead... smallwoods - 2021-05-23 11:57:00 |
| 57 | lovelurking wrote:
No Privacy Act breach because the auction was public. Of course the buyer or seller might have asked for the post to be pulled, just like the family of Pauline Hanna asked the Herald to change their story about her being vaccinated soon before she died suddenly. Edited by committed at 12:11 pm, Sun 23 May committed - 2021-05-23 12:11:00 |
| 58 | committed wrote: Wonder if they'll also ask for the stories of traces of methamphetamine being found at her home too? sparkychap - 2021-05-23 12:13:00 |
| 59 | sparkychap wrote:
Meth could be a red herring as there could have been traces there when the house was bought by the current owners. But police would presumably know if meth was consumed by the deceased. committed - 2021-05-23 12:18:00 |
| 60 | committed wrote: So could having had a COVID jab. Or that she'd also been in contact with a private detective. sparkychap - 2021-05-23 12:23:00 |
| 61 | lovelurking wrote: toyboy3 - 2021-05-23 12:25:00 |
| 62 | sparkychap wrote:
Yes, but the Herald hasn’t removed references to those. committed - 2021-05-23 12:27:00 |
| 63 | committed wrote: No maybe because they aren't worried about that fact to be twisted by the anti Private Detective Conspiracy Nuts. Edited by sparkychap at 12:28 pm, Sun 23 May sparkychap - 2021-05-23 12:28:00 |
| 64 | sparkychap wrote:
The Herald is in the reporting business, not the worrying business. Besides it recently reported that the deaths of two elderly people who had received the Covid vaccine had been referred to CARM. Edited by committed at 12:57 pm, Sun 23 May committed - 2021-05-23 12:56:00 |
| 65 | committed wrote: Exactly, and they left a nice big footnote to the story to explain that they'd removed the COVID refence from the body of the text at the request of the family and why. No conspiracy here, nothing to see, nothing to see. sparkychap - 2021-05-23 13:06:00 |
| 66 | sparkychap wrote:
Thanks Sparky, found what I was looking for and confirmed what I thought. Sold for less than the listed price. joanie04 - 2021-05-23 14:32:00 |
| 67 | The member deleted this message. neryl1 - 2021-05-23 19:05:00 |
| 68 | sparkychap wrote:
You obviously believe everything you read in the paper. committed - 2021-05-24 07:16:00 |
| 69 | As a motor vehicle trader if someone askes me what I sold a car for I tell them that is between me and the buyer. It may even be a breach of privacy laws to tell. In my mind it should be the same for real estate. Although as others have said the sale prices can be public information. curlcrown - 2021-05-24 07:46:00 |
| 70 | committed wrote: I was just repeating what you said in #57. Weren't you telling the truth? sparkychap - 2021-05-24 08:34:00 |
| 71 | curlcrown wrote: Sales prices are considered public information once settled and often before as discussed above. What sort of situation would we have if the only people who knew sales prices were agents and banks? sparkychap - 2021-05-24 08:42:00 |
| 72 | sparkychap wrote:
What business is it of Jo Bloggs Public what it sold for anyway ? lovelurking - 2021-05-24 11:04:00 |
| 73 | lovelurking wrote:
That's all good, in your case, other like to be informed. smallwoods - 2021-05-24 14:14:00 |
| 74 | committed wrote:
Exactly. The vendors of the last property we purchased accepted our lower offer because it was unconditional. scarlettnz - 2021-05-24 16:34:00 |
| 75 | lovelurking wrote: Well I see your examples as vastly different to buying a house, and would want to be fully informed when buying or selling my biggest asset. But if you're good to sell for less than the market value, that's cool. sparkychap - 2021-05-24 17:51:00 |
| 76 | No intention of selling thanks sparkychap but it’s only worth what someone is prepared to pay. (isn’t it?) I still don’t understand why the need to know what something went for is so important to someone who wasn’t involved in the purchase when they can find out on line? It’s not as if all the houses in the street are the same as the one next door... lovelurking - 2021-05-24 18:43:00 |
| 77 | lovelurking wrote: and how much the bank might be willing to lend on it... lovelurking wrote: 1: Because they might not want to wait the 6-8 weeks to see it online if they are active in the market and 2: they might actually be intelligent enough to understand what is comparable and what isn't. sparkychap - 2021-05-24 19:23:00 |
