STAMP CLUB
| # | Post |
|---|---|
| 5201 | I have my stamp collection listed at an agreed value as part of my contents insurance. I listed my entire collection and had a recognized stamp dealer write a letter confirming the value of my collection. The insurance company was happy with this. The policy does state that they will pay out to a maximum of 75% of Stanley Gibbons catalogue value for any individual stamps or sets. Different insurance companies may have different policies. I hope that this is helpful. Generally household insurance will cover collections with a value up to $2000 without them being specifically listed. stak - 2013-06-03 18:23:00 |
| 5202 | tmg wrote: rebel58 - 2013-06-03 18:31:00 |
| 5203 | rebel58 wrote:
well it is alleged to have claimed a few of the fake & more dubious suspects around - could there be more or just in the next round claim some of their supporters ? ;-) tmg - 2013-06-03 18:37:00 |
| 5204 | I am so ashamed ,unrightfully helping to persecute the seller of dubious items and trying to defend the greedy fools that willfully bought the items .Shame on me and you tmg and the others that help expose this fraudster. rebel58 - 2013-06-03 19:46:00 |
| 5205 | The member deleted this message. muzz8 - 2013-06-03 20:51:00 |
| 5206 | Can anybody give a value of a 5/- Mount Cook with a overprint of "The Farmers Co-Operate Auctioneering Co. NZ". (There is also a date shown but I can not make it out). I know it is a fiscal but not sure of the value. I have a 4/- Queen Victoria and a 2/- Milford Sound with this overprint on it. I also have a 2/- Queen Victoria and a 2/- milford sound with the overprint "The Farmers Co-Op Auctioneering Co. NZ. teddybearlover - 2013-06-03 21:10:00 |
| 5207 | teddybearlover wrote:
I doubt that they are overprints. more likely to be a rubber stamp applied on the stamp by hand rather than printed. Normal fiscal price for these so the 5/- Mt. cook would be worth $15 to $25, The long types perhaps $5 each and the 2/- Milford Sound around $5 too. Mind you its not easy to be precise without seeing how attractive or dreadful they look and this will certailny make a big difference, kiwisteven - 2013-06-03 23:34:00 |
| 5208 | Thanks 'kiwisteven". You are correct. Not an overprint.A poor choice of words. It appears to be a "rubber stamp" as you implied. Light purple in colour. A good looking stamp. teddybearlover - 2013-06-04 00:37:00 |
| 5209 | This message was deleted. muzz8 - 2013-06-04 11:21:00 |
| 5210 | The member deleted this message. teddybearlover - 2013-06-04 16:32:00 |
| 5211 | Image as requested "muzz8" & "kiwisteven" Edited by teddybearlover at 4:44 pm, Tue 4 Jun teddybearlover - 2013-06-04 16:35:00 |
| 5212 | I have found another one, a 5/- Mount Cook, on this site but the price is very very high. Paid about $10 - $15 for each of them on the world auction site. Wish I could find more!!! (Hint for the dealers here) Edited by teddybearlover at 4:43 pm, Tue 4 Jun teddybearlover - 2013-06-04 16:42:00 |
| 5213 | This message was deleted. muzz8 - 2013-06-04 16:50:00 |
| 5214 | The member deleted this message. muzz8 - 2013-06-04 17:29:00 |
| 5215 | Sorry "muzz8" no gum on the backs. Can you please tell me what the, for want of a better word, "postmark" of the 6d 1935 pictorial of the third line of the second scan is? Also I would be interested in bidding on any that you put up for auction. teddybearlover - 2013-06-04 19:01:00 |
| 5216 | This message was deleted. muzz8 - 2013-06-04 20:14:00 |
| 5217 | muzz8 wrote: teddybearlover - 2013-06-04 21:27:00 |
| 5218 | This message was deleted. muzz8 - 2013-06-05 11:38:00 |
| 5219 | This message was deleted. donaldo - 2013-06-05 15:53:00 |
| 5220 | I have just bought my first lot of social security stamps - am wondering how does one go about finding the value of them ... not that I expect anything special to be in them. bdreid10 - 2013-06-06 13:17:00 |
| 5221 | bdreid10 wrote: rebel58 - 2013-06-06 16:13:00 |
| 5222 | This message was deleted. muzz8 - 2013-06-06 17:00:00 |
| 5223 | This message was deleted. donaldo - 2013-06-07 12:02:00 |
| 5224 | Thanks for that rebel58, now another question - I have been looking for and I have heard very hard to get the thematic stanley gibbons catalog for collecting railways on stamps. I did fine a couple on another overseas site but they would not ship to NZ. Any suggestions as I fear that those who have this catalog want it and will not part with it which is understandable. bdreid10 - 2013-06-09 09:00:00 |
| 5225 | bdreid10 wrote: rebel58 - 2013-06-09 09:17:00 |
| 5226 | This message was deleted. donaldo - 2013-06-12 15:15:00 |
| 5227 | bdreid10 wrote:
A trick if yu can with this, is have the item shipped to soemone you know in a place they will ship it too, then have them send it to NZ.i HAVE HAD FREINDS DO THIS FOR us PURCHASES, OF COURSE YOU HAVE TO KNOW SOMEONE IN THAT COUNTRY....oPPS CAPS LOCK, BUT ANYWAY, THATS WHY THEY INVENTED FACEBOOK, SO YOU CAN FIND EPOPLE FROM YOUR PAST TO SUE FOR POSTAGE ... bca - 2013-06-13 07:44:00 |
| 5228 | Well that was a horribly written post and meant use, not "sue". damn typing skills. bca - 2013-06-13 07:45:00 |
| 5229 | The member deleted this message. muzz8 - 2013-06-13 07:50:00 |
| 5230 | bca, I have just had my early morning laugh. minimoe - 2013-06-13 07:54:00 |
| 5231 | The Christchurch Stamp & Postcard Fair will be on this Saturday at the Philatelic Centre, 67 Mandeville St in Riccarton. Come and meet your favorite Trademe sellers or buyers 9am to noon. rebel58 - 2013-06-13 16:08:00 |
| 5232 | rebel58 wrote: twg1935 - 2013-06-14 09:06:00 |
| 5233 | whats more honest / reliable when selling true bulk amounts, selling by weight or selling be estimated number of stamps? Wasn't sure if to put 1.8kg on paper or guesstimate a number of stamps..... bca - 2013-06-14 15:07:00 |
| 5234 | bca wrote:
Best to do both and that way people have the best idea of what you are offering. make sure you also have a scan of picture as many people won't bid on something they can't see. kiwisteven - 2013-06-14 20:29:00 |
| 5235 | rebel58 wrote:
I always get there early only to find plenty of people already there to snap up the bargains. Mind you if you are late then you might get a desparate seller! kiwisteven - 2013-06-14 20:31:00 |
| 5236 | Hi twg1935, I am somewhat puzzeled by the listing you have of this stamp. I can find no info for this "error" and it appears this could be more of a poor rendering of the P. Can you advise where you got the "error" info as I would be most interested. Thanks http://images.trademe.co.nz/photoserver/full/271206514.jpg bambam - 2013-06-15 15:31:00 |
| 5237 | I have over 300 "error" stamps, but that is very interesting. Has anyone seen one similar b4? bambam - 2013-06-15 17:37:00 |
| 5238 | A gremlin Flaw ,more than likely not constant possible under inking or damage to the Printing plate.Nice Print fault.A Basic knowledge of the printing process would be of advantage Edited by rebel58 at 7:01 pm, Sat 15 Jun rebel58 - 2013-06-15 18:55:00 |
| 5239 | Hey Rebel58, would you say it was a 2 or 5 numeral transposed for a P? bambam - 2013-06-15 19:10:00 |
| 5240 | bambam wrote: twg1935 - 2013-06-16 00:01:00 |
| 5241 | twg1935 wrote: bambam - 2013-06-16 12:13:00 |
| 5242 | bambam wrote: twg1935 - 2013-06-16 14:14:00 |
| 5243 | Hi again Gary, I did not put the question on the auction so as not to put any buyers off. I thought I was doing the right thing by you. Report it to TradeMe! As for fast buck sellers, you have seen the listings where a minor "colour shift" is being sold as an "error". I agree it is a buyers choice, if, they have the correct information. I am disappointed that you have still not replied as to why you are convinced this is a "2" or inverted "5" and in your words that are quoted on your auction, "definitely not a P". This forum is about sharing and learning, I would have thought some others would be interested to know also. I have received numerous emails re this thread, and to quote one of them, "I'm not getting into this one, but I look forward to his answer re: provenance, it's new to me!" That's what its about Gary, simply...why is it a 2 or 5 and not a P. I would like to know, I might be sitting on a fortune!! Kindest regards, Anthony Edited by bambam at 3:05 pm, Sun 16 Jun bambam - 2013-06-16 14:57:00 |
| 5244 | Not referring to any specific image, it would be educational to have an image rater on this site !? philafarinz - 2013-06-17 11:32:00 |
| 5245 | I think that would be a great idea, however I think it would end up with too many "experts" as can happen in many club forums. The best advise/knowledge base I find is here. http://www.stampboards.com/ bambam - 2013-06-17 12:30:00 |
| 5246 | This message was deleted. donaldo - 2013-06-17 12:34:00 |
| 5247 | I have many poor printing of overprints and wonder whether a poor overprint would rate as a financial gain. Also, as a respected authority within the stamp world, would you donaldo care to express your opinion as to the stamp in question. I, and others would value your comments. Again, this is what this forum is about. Learning and expanding all our pooled knowledge. bambam - 2013-06-17 12:42:00 |
| 5248 | Hi all, as per above debate. I think epoples feedback says a lot too. I have "wronged" people in various ways at time, but as the store in wellignton says, its the putting right that counts. There are some with unrealistic expectations or who failt o read an auction and understand terms and conditions e.g. a listed postage price and then complain about postage. There is a very true saying, you do not have to bid and if you do, so long as what is described is not inaccurate, then it is buyer beware. If as a seller you make a mistake, then own the mistake and make it right for the buyer e.g. I sometimes get tangled in all my postage and buyers get the wrong item. I had one guy, not happy with brown spots, and as I had not said there were any and they were not possible to be seen, refunded upon return of the goods. I think you have to do unto others in trades and you would want other to do to you (hmmm almost sounds religious LOL). Anyway, happy messageboarding all. bca - 2013-06-17 12:55:00 |
| 5249 | philafarinz wrote:
To the above posts, that may be a bit off the mark as what I intended - to clarify. An Image Rater in a listing - 5 Stars - you select which how many stars would be appropriate for the image placed. A 5 Star evaluation for a good clear large image or More than one person could evaluate giving the average result. If the image is good the rating would be high, if not many will pass listing. Is that not educational ? philafarinz - 2013-06-17 15:34:00 |
| 5250 | This message was deleted. donaldo - 2013-06-17 15:58:00 |
