STAMP CLUB
| # | Post |
|---|---|
| 4951 | This message was deleted. muzz8 - 2013-04-28 15:01:00 |
| 4952 | The member deleted this message. muzz8 - 2013-04-28 15:04:00 |
| 4953 | muzz8 wrote:
there is an awareness of existence of catalogues & references -- reponses & earlier listings already suggest this ;-) Advised of recent current catalogue ID details & values from international sources - some asks have been dropped in response from $1000 to $100/$50 v catalogue & possible market value of $1 or less - try explaining that one away if not deceptive & deliberate overpricing to fair market value anywhere ? ;-) Edited by tmg at 4:27 pm, Sun 28 Apr tmg - 2013-04-28 16:18:00 |
| 4954 | As NZSDA & Trade Me would undoubtedly like to see & promote -- an informed marketplace is a happy one - aside from the odd cowboy or two ;-) tmg - 2013-04-28 16:42:00 |
| 4955 | This message was deleted. muzz8 - 2013-04-28 17:04:00 |
| 4956 | Ask yourself -- items pulled from a collection -- not researched -- high probability of cheaper items to be expected in many cases IMO - 'dont know about these' - will list - suggest rare & slam a $500 / $1000 start & hope ??? ;-) Not really good enough is it - nor does it fully satisfy Trade Me's listing requirements (since most would expect 'Rare' representation to be qualified / explained in some manner, and capable of being verified or supported ) There is an expectation that a seller would know have some reasonable idea or have reseached what he is selling - otherwise how does he know what he is listing ? ;-) Ignorance really isn't a satisfactory defence when listing a supposedly represented 'rare' item, but havent researched it and later come up bare when it comes to justifying that representation ;-) if seller really didn't know or couldnt be bothered - leave out the 'Rare' representation - list at a $1 start & let the market determine what the value mite be ;-) Edited by tmg at 5:38 pm, Sun 28 Apr tmg - 2013-04-28 17:24:00 |
| 4957 | muzz8 wrote: Interesting studying his auction activity. carzx - 2013-04-28 17:51:00 |
| 4958 | This message was deleted. muzz8 - 2013-04-28 17:53:00 |
| 4959 | muzz8 wrote: Oh....I dunno. He apparently sold some photocopy stamp/stamps to someone, advertising them as high CV, but they have a thin or so, so to consider the stamp/stamps as spacefillers. Then when the buyer complained it was a photocopy, he said "I told you it was a spacefiller". Not the same thing. Deliberately dishonest by my definition. If TM don't have any rules about that, then it's high time they got some. carzx - 2013-04-28 17:56:00 |
| 4960 | The member deleted this message. muzz8 - 2013-04-28 18:16:00 |
| 4961 | muzz8 wrote: Quote from the auction - How can you have mint fakes? Spacefillers are usually damaged stamps. carzx - 2013-04-28 18:35:00 |
| 4962 | I might add, for interest, on eBay, they have a rule that you are not allowed to sell fakes unless they have "facsimile" or something printed on the back, and that it is shown in the auction photo. carzx - 2013-04-28 18:43:00 |
| 4963 | This message was deleted. muzz8 - 2013-04-28 18:52:00 |
| 4964 | muzz8 wrote: I tend to disagree, just going by the few action comments I looked at, and the seller spurning expert opinion. In fact, it is my opinion that he is a scoundrel. carzx - 2013-04-28 18:54:00 |
| 4965 | muzz8 wrote: A beginner may not know what they should look like, and trust the listing. Look at the other examples as well. Deliberate deception. His feedback and alleged court-case filing should take care of it eventually. Edited by carzx at 6:58 pm, Sun 28 Apr carzx - 2013-04-28 18:57:00 |
| 4966 | This message was deleted. muzz8 - 2013-04-28 19:08:00 |
| 4967 | muzz8 wrote: see post #4961 carzx - 2013-04-28 19:13:00 |
| 4968 | The member deleted this message. muzz8 - 2013-04-28 19:30:00 |
| 4969 | muzz8 wrote: http://stamps.about.com/od/glossarypt/g/Space-Filler.htm It doesn't mean a fake. carzx - 2013-04-28 19:43:00 |
| 4970 | This message was deleted. muzz8 - 2013-04-28 19:55:00 |
| 4971 | muzz8 wrote: Thank you. carzx - 2013-04-28 19:55:00 |
| 4972 | Speaking of fakes, is this stamp likely to be something authentic? http://i721.photobucket.com/albums/ww218/finntroy/6dbrown_zp carzx - 2013-04-29 11:55:00 |
| 4973 | o.k. dumb question of the day. How do you measure perf's? bca - 2013-04-29 12:16:00 |
| 4974 | This message was deleted. loision - 2013-04-29 12:23:00 |
| 4975 | bca wrote: http://www.stampmasteralbum.com/StampInformation/Perforation You can also find perf charts that are able to be printed out on your printer. Just make sure the printer settings don't change the scale. You can check something with known perfs to make sure your printed version came out ok. Unless it's a more valuable than the average mint decimal, I am inclined to use them as postage. I even use MNH decimals as postage. If you're prepared to wait for the right fish to come along, you might get face value or even plus a little. For me, I would rather sell something more collectable than to clog my listings with slow movers, especially when you get full value by putting the stamp on an envelope, as opposed to the hassle of processing a sale. carzx - 2013-04-29 12:29:00 |
| 4976 | carzx wrote:
Thanks on both accounts. Based on interest so far, appears some minor interest in MH whole years, but at lower than face value, but almost no interest in Miniature sheets......well if they dont sell, will hold and use for postage. Might take a few years though LOL, even at less than postage value, money in bank worth money not realised....so will try for a week or two then give up I think. I have a perf guage, old style, but need to learn how to use it. Will look at that link you gave me tonight. bca - 2013-04-29 16:32:00 |
| 4977 | just looked at that link, thats heaps !!!! a very useful response to a question :) bca - 2013-04-29 16:35:00 |
| 4978 | Next questions: What are the best catalouges for Alternative post and conderella's - NZ only. I already have the fiscal specilist catalouge, need to learn more on other variations. Happy to buy if epople knwo where or listings on here you would reccomend? bca - 2013-04-29 16:38:00 |
| 4979 | The member deleted this message. muzz8 - 2013-04-29 19:19:00 |
| 4980 | It looks like you mite be the only one Muzz so far supporting the 'throw things up here - if it looks rare or unusual suggest rare for more impact - whack on a 100 or 1000 opening ask or multiple thereof on it - no further research or enquiry needed & just wait and hope' type strategy -- my bet is if everyone gets their friends in here, the club supporting these sort of tactics will still be very vastly outnumbered - probably by an inverse multiple of the real value to asking start on some of our little friend's choice offerings, but then you probably expect that to be the case too ;-) Edited by tmg at 7:40 pm, Mon 29 Apr tmg - 2013-04-29 19:30:00 |
| 4981 | This message was deleted. muzz8 - 2013-04-29 19:54:00 |
| 4982 | carzx wrote: Edited by rebel58 at 8:13 pm, Mon 29 Apr rebel58 - 2013-04-29 20:00:00 |
| 4983 | The member deleted this message. muzz8 - 2013-04-29 20:12:00 |
| 4984 | The key word is spacefiller.My interpretation of spacefiller is a genuine stamp,damaged ,faults etc .A spacefiller in the stamp world is not a forgery. Edited by rebel58 at 8:30 pm, Mon 29 Apr rebel58 - 2013-04-29 20:21:00 |
| 4985 | The member deleted this message. muzz8 - 2013-04-29 20:29:00 |
| 4986 | muzz8 wrote: rebel58 - 2013-04-29 20:32:00 |
| 4987 | The member deleted this message. muzz8 - 2013-04-29 20:34:00 |
| 4988 | This message was deleted. muzz8 - 2013-04-29 20:38:00 |
| 4989 | muzz8 wrote: just leave tmg alone and trademe will deal with it if they get enough complaints. See any similarities there? carzx - 2013-04-29 21:20:00 |
| 4990 | rebel58 wrote: He probably won't buy it for that price, as there wouldn't be enough mark-up. I haven't seen a serrate perf in these stamps, so have nothing to compare with. If the perfs are homemade, I'm thinking what a waste of a stamp. carzx - 2013-04-29 21:23:00 |
| 4991 | muzz8 wrote: A spacefiller is not a forgery by definition, but a forgery can be used as a spacefiller. carzx - 2013-04-29 21:26:00 |
| 4992 | This message was deleted. muzz8 - 2013-04-29 21:32:00 |
| 4993 | The member deleted this message. muzz8 - 2013-04-29 21:34:00 |
| 4994 | muzz8 wrote: I'm not seeking nor need anything of the sort. Merely pointing out the pot... kettle..... black aspect. carzx - 2013-04-29 21:37:00 |
| 4995 | This message was deleted. muzz8 - 2013-04-29 21:43:00 |
| 4996 | muzz8 wrote: Advertising a stamp as a spacefiller when it is a forgery, especially when talking about thins or other damage, is lying. Advertising it as a fake that can be used as a spacefiller, is the truthful approach. carzx - 2013-04-29 21:43:00 |
| 4997 | Trade Me wrote: I'm quite happy to put my energy into talking stamps, as soon as someone who knows something about them comes back. Meanwhile, I'm stuck with chatting with a defense lawyer. carzx - 2013-04-29 21:46:00 |
| 4998 | The member deleted this message. muzz8 - 2013-04-29 21:49:00 |
| 4999 | muzz8 wrote: Not at all. It's like a spanner isn't a hammer, but someone could use it as one. carzx - 2013-04-29 21:51:00 |
| 5000 | muzz8 wrote: rebel58 - 2013-04-29 21:58:00 |
